Reading opened the world

Books can create a closed space where our minds can roam openly.
Province of Pesaro and Urbino, Italy. Photo by Eugenio Mazzone on Unsplash

“Books were once my refuge…To read was to disappear, become enrobed in something beyond my own jittery ego. To read was to shutter myself and, in so doing, discover a larger experience. I do think old, book-oriented styles of reading opened the world to me – by closing it. And new, screen-oriented styles of reading seem to have the opposite effect: They close the world to me, by opening it. In a very real way, to lose old styles of reading is to lose a part of ourselves.”Michael Harris

Solitude is rarely a preference, though it may seem to be one because people sometimes choose literal isolation over the dismay of feeling unwanted or misunderstood, lonely even in a crowd. For many of us who have felt the sting of ridicule or censure, our anxiety and fear of rejection draw us into the world of reading, which offers both safety and discovery.

In the old world of printed books, authors who were good enough to be traditionally published and widely read seemed to understand that writing speaks most directly to a reader when there is a bond of mutual trust. By refusing to spell out every detail in condescending dictation, the author allowed her reader to create and follow the details of his own imaginative trail, moving at his own pace. By allowing room for each imagination to re-create its own narrative, the best authors lead readers into a wider world where mindful discovery, understanding and acceptance become possible.

Does digital content accomplish the same thing? I wonder. Digitization encourages a kind of racing through, leapfrogging as one link after another beckons us on in rapid-fire sequence that leaves us little time for reflection. It also creates separate but conflicting echo chambers to accommodate various dogmas and preferences, where anger can fester and feed on itself, and ultimately spill over into off-screen life.

I find the closing sentences of Harris’ quote chilling because I do believe the screens that open the world to us can ironically shut us off from others, even as they create the illusion of being present in human discussion and activity. In the video format, it’s all laid out for us in full color. In online text, messages may be spelled out emphatically, in repetitive ranting. In either format, we can accept or reject content without really being involved at all. It’s easy not to participate by exercising our own judgment or imagination, which is allowed a free ride as all the gaps are filled in with whatever conclusions the content creators want us to see and hear.

When we do interact with the screen, it’s usually in the form of impulsive clicking, jumping from one author to another as we skim furiously and cherry-pick the parts we most want to read– which often means reading only those things with which we already agree. Does this form of open access, this ability to make quantum leaps from one topic to another, paradoxically leave us with narrower ideas and understandings? Does it allow our minds to close off whatever is less flashy and compelling as we dart after the sensational or self-affirming?

Harris observes that screens seem to close the world to him by opening it. I suspect this is an intuition that will resonate with many of us. If so, perhaps it’s partly because, aside from the anxiety and anger, the screen-oriented world simply overwhelms us with link after link, leaving us apt to shut down or gravitate to what is useful and functional and familiar.

When I read the article (linked to Harris’ name above) from which this quote and last week’s quote were drawn, I realized that there is a significant difference in how I feel after I’ve spent a half-hour or more online, and how I feel after I’ve been absorbed in an old fashioned print book. I’m noticeably less calm, sometimes even a bit agitated, after screen time. Yet a book slows me down, psychologically and physically, even when it engages my imagination.

The reasons for the contrast are many, not least of which is that it’s much more difficult to curl up in an easy chair with a computer. I suspect it also has to do with the random nature of online content, where I am forced to encounter (through ads, pop up windows and “helpful” suggested articles) offerings I never intended to buy with even a few seconds of my valuable time and attention.

There’s no easy answer to all this. I have no intention of shutting myself off from cyberspace; in fact, I’m participating in the cacophony by writing this post, as I have done for nearly seven years now. But I believe, with increasing certitude, that one way to defeat the ever-increasing despair of today’s world is to step away from it all as often as possible, and to build– one book, one activity, one friendship or one project at a time– a sanctuary from the dominion of mechanical mind control.


  1. I love books! Old fashioned great binding books! I love the smell of books and types of print in books! There is just so much I do love about curling up on the couch and reading with a real book. I love holding my Bible in my hands and reading the Word. Yes, Julia I do love old fashioned books!😊💓😊 I keep you and Matt in my prayers. Love and Light!🌞🌞🌞

    • Cherie, I love this comment– it sounds like something I might say myself. Hope that you and Ron are doing well or at least OK. Let’s keep praying for each other. Matt and I still need the prayers, as much as ever or maybe more. Thanks for being here! ❤ ❤ ❤

  2. Harry Sims

    Julia my dear, your erudite commentary immediately draws me to the conclusion that I must make time and must participate in reflection and contemplation.
    Otherwise there is a strong possibility of being hooked into what you so excellently described.
    I want to thank you for the these seven years…


    • Harry I know you are active in a 12 step group which I think meets in person. I hope they never try to take it online! Such “real world” communities are important and will be a good way not to get too caught up in the online world.

  3. Chris

    Hi Julia,
    I hope you had a good week. These past two posts were interesting, and it was fascinating to read your interpretation, your experience and feelings. I’m still pondering. 😊
    Well, just wanted to say hi, 👋! I have a busy weekend planned; hope yours is enjoyable.

    • Thank you, Chris! I appreciate your greetings and presence here, and I hope your busy weekend goes as smoothly and pleasantly as possible.

  4. Sheila

    Good Sunday afternoon, Julia. I think I’ve fallen victim of too much internet time, much wasted time that I hate to admit. Your two part posts have been very timely. Thank you more than you know! I hope you’re doing well. We spent several days at Willow Tree and last night’s Halloween festivities were especially fun. The trick or treater’s went from site to site to collect their goodies and then enjoyed a hayride to complete the evening. It was an honest to goodness tractor pulling a wagon filled with hay. So often the simpler things are the most fun. 🎃🧡🍁

    • Sheila, I’m glad to know that kids still get to go on hayrides! Willow Tree sounds like the perfect place to be in the autumn, and a great antidote to digital overload. I am doing OK. Bad days, good days, and in-between days. My British pen pal of almost 30 years arrives tomorrow for her first-ever visit to the USA, so we plan to have lots of fun over the next two weeks. I met her on a trip to England in 2001, but this will be only the second time we’ve met in person. We’re planning to spend time at both homes plus a trip to New York City where we’ll see a Broadway play and the Radio City Music Hall’s Christmas production, which is ALREADY starting soon! At least they will wait until after Halloween…

  5. mike c. Bertoglio

    That sounds like a great plan. Will you get to Brooklyn Botanical?? I never made it back to Gibbs garden for a last year visit. I can’t decide if i want up get another year membership. I think I have too, don’t you.?
    I finished the Rache Evans Held book. What a bright light snuffed out so early. I will have to read some more of her. In one section she goes into a little of the h istory of things and how it was the Methodist preachers who led the fight for slavery-declaring it the will of God. ETC. We don’t hear much about that.

    • I’m sure Evans did her homework on the Methodist preachers, but I’m equally sure that not all of them took a pro-slavery line. There are many things we don’t hear much about. For example, how much did we learn about William Wilberforce and the influence of his own conversion to Christianity that inspired his crusade against slavery in England decades before the American Civil War?

  6. mike c. Bertoglio

    Interesting insights. And in the on line world ifyou click on something that sounds interesting you will be bombarded with adds from a multitude of sources.

    • Yes, that’s one thing that drove me away from spending too much time on the computer. Distractions lead me to forgetting my priorities.

  7. mike

    Found a cute little bookstore in Woodstock.: Fox Tail books. An independent affair they were having an author night for Beatriz Williams whom I had not heard of. Very quaint on the main street in Town. I suppose the Kindle readers are allowed?

    • Yes, I think the world of publishing and all its various branches have been forced to embrace digital books, whether they wanted to or not. I love the way public libraries now offer all formats of books. Many of us utilize them all.

Thanks for encouraging others by sharing your thoughts:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: