The articulate audible voice

Booksellers at the Dickens Fair sell "contemporary" Victorian selections. San Francisco, California, December 2002

Booksellers at the Dickens Fair sell “contemporary” Victorian selections.
San Francisco, California, December 2002

“In books lies the soul of the whole Past Time: the articulate audible voice of the Past, when the body and material substance of it has altogether vanished like a dream.”
Thomas Carlyle

There’s at least one realm where the past, present and future really do co-exist, and that is in the world of books. Popular authors of historical nonfiction, such as Barbara Tuchman and David McCullough, use skillful storytelling to shed light on the past and how it can influence our lives now and in years to come.

If you’ve ever read a novel that takes you back to the past and brings it to life in your mind, it’s safe to assume the author did extensive research while writing.  Despite the occasional anachronisms and other historical errors (which are likely to become more common now that many books are published without the in-house editing that once preceded publication), I’ve found that most authors exhibit an impressive knowledge of the period inhabited by their characters.  The enduring popularity of historical fiction argues against the commonly-heard assertion that history is boring and irrelevant.

To really travel back in time, though, nothing beats reading the works of authors who wrote of their own time so skillfully that their works became classics.  It’s illuminating to view an era through the eyes of its contemporaries, who wrote without benefit of hindsight or today’s politically correct censorship (Mark Twain’s works are consistently among those most frequently challenged in libraries).

Recent historical novels often feature characters created to appeal to modern sensibilities, but I sometimes wonder whether this represents an unlikely distortion of the social and political climate that would have been pervasively influential. The characters who lived in the same era as the authors who created them are arguably more authentic than even the most well-researched invention of a modern author.

If you’ve enjoyed a historical novel set in a time recent enough to make this possible, here’s an idea to try: seek out a novel that was written during that same era, set in the period in which it was written.  How do the two compare?  If you enjoy nonfiction, drama or poetry, you have a much greater span of centuries from which to draw comparisons with recent literature; pretty much all of recorded history includes examples of these forms that survive to this day.

It’s hard to say how future authors might portray our own time, but probably there will be at least a few exaggerations, omissions or misunderstandings. Were we around to read them, they might prompt us to say “But it wasn’t really like that!”  I hope that many of today’s literary voices will survive and be read for generations to come.  An articulate, audible voice from the past will always have an authenticity that can’t quite be duplicated, however well it is imitated.

One year ago today:

Irrevocably a reader

This post was first published seven years ago today. The original post, comments and photo are linked, along with two other related posts, below. These links to related posts, and their thumbnail photos, do not appear in the blog feed; they are only visible when viewing the individual posts by clicking on each one. I have no idea why, nor do I know how they choose the related posts. That’s just the way WordPress does things.

2 Comments

  1. mike c

    I did enjoy the work about the building of cathedral by Kenneth Follet-“Cathedral” sp?.But as far as contemporary writers of this kind -I am drawing a blank.
    I started to read Halberstram book on Nam ” The great and shining Lie.” but found it too depressing and moved on.

    • I like Follett’s cathedral series. I started the American series but didn’t like it as well as the one about the cathedral. I’ve never read A Bright Shining Lie (actually written by Vann and Sheehan) partly because I feared it would be too depressing. Are you perhaps thinking of David Halberstam? He wrote many books of history, including some on war, none of which I’ve ever read. For history, I don’t think you can do better than David McCullough.

Thanks for encouraging others by sharing your thoughts:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: